Risk Extension for Unfair Terms

Living Document,

Editors:
Elena Molino Peña (SCORE, Universidad de Sevilla)
Jos De Roo (IDLab, Ghent University - imec)
Beatriz Esteves (IDLab, Ghent University - imec)
José María García (SCORE, Universidad de Sevilla)
Antonio Ruiz Cortés (SCORE, Universidad de Sevilla)
Feedback:
GitHub isa-group/tosl-risk (pull requests, new issue, open issues)
Download Serialization
License
CC-BY 4.0

Abstract

This specification has the goal to introduce concepts needed to model risk in contractual clauses from Terms of Services.

1. Introd­uction

This specification has the goal to introduce concepts needed to model risk in contractual clauses from Terms of Services. As such, building on the DPV specification and its Risk extension, we provide a set of terms to represent unfair terms as risk:RiskSource and legal mitigation mechanisms as dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure.

1.1. Namespaces

Commonly used namespace prefixes used in this specification:

@prefix dcterms:        <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix rdf:            <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix tosl-risk:      <https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#> .
@prefix dpv:            <https://w3id.org/dpv#> .
@prefix risk:           <https://w3id.org/dpv/risk#> .
@prefix justifications: <https://w3id.org/dpv/justifications#> .

2. Vocabulary

2.1. Risk Sources

Risk sources
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#UnfairContractClause
Label Unfair Contract Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause creating a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the provider and the consumer
Parent risk:OrganisationalManagementRisk
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ArbitrationClause
Label Arbitration Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause requiring the consumer to resolve disputes through arbitration before initiating legal proceedings
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Annex UCTD. 1(q)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ChoiceOfLawClause
Label Choice of Law Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause establishing that disputes are governed by the law of a jurisdiction different from the consumer’s place of residence
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Article 3(1) UCTD and Article 6 (2) UCTD
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ContentRemovalClause
Label Content Removal Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause allowing the provider to unilaterally remove consumer’s content
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source GDPR and CJEU
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ContractByUsingClause
Label Contract by Using Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause stating that the contractual terms are accepted through the consumer’s use of the service
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Annex UCTD. 1(i)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#JurisdictionClause
Label Jurisdiction Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause requiring disputes to be resolved outside the consumer’s country of residence
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Article 3(1) UCTD
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#LimitationOfLiabilityClause
Label Limitation of Liability Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause limiting the provider’s responsibility for damages or losses incurred by the consumer while using the service
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Annex UCTD. 1(b)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#UnilateralChangeClause
Label Unilateral Change Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause allowing the provider to unilaterally modify the contract or the service
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Annex UCTD. 1(j and k)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#UnilateralTerminationClause
Label Unilateral Termination Clause
Type dpv:RiskConcept, dpv:PotentialRiskSource, dpv:PotentialRisk
Definition Clause allowing the provider to unilaterally terminate the contract or access to the service
Parent tosl-risk:UnfairContractClause
Source Annex UCTD. 1(f and g)

2.2. Risk Mitigation Measures & Justifications

Risk mitigation measures & justifications
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#DeletionJustification
Label Deletion Justification
Type dpv:Justification
Definition Control that requires providing justified reasons when user data is deleted
Parent justifications:ExerciseJustification
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ChangeJustification
Label Deletion Justification
Type dpv:Justification
Definition Control that requires providing justified reasons when contractual terms are modified
Parent justifications:ExerciseJustification
Source Annex UCTD. 1(j), 1(k)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#TerminationJustification
Label Termination Justification
Type dpv:Justification
Definition Control that requires providing justified reasons when a service is terminated
Parent justifications:ExerciseJustification
Source Annex UCTD. 1(g)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#AccessToCourts
Label Access to Courts
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures consumers retain the right to take legal action without being required arbitration
Parent dpv:OrganisationalMeasure
Source Annex UCTD. 1(q)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ConsumerResidenceJurisdiction
Label Consumer Residence Jurisdiction
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures disputes can be brought before the courts of the consumer’s place of residence
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ConsumerCountryGoverningLaw
Label Consumer Country Governing Law
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures the applicable law corresponds to the consumer’s country of residence
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#DeletionNotice
Label Deletion Notice
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that requires notifying the consumer in advance before deleting user data
Parent dpv:Notice
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#DataRetrievalMechanism
Label Data Retrieval Mechanism
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures consumers can retrieve their stored data when user data is deleted
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ExplicitConsentControl
Label Explicit Consent Control
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that requires the consumer’s explicit consent before accepting the contractual terms
Source Annex UCTD. 1(i)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#RightToCompensation
Label Right to Compensation
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures consumers can receive compensation when damages occur due to the provider’s actions or contractual obligations
Source Annex UCTD. 1(b)
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ChangeNotice
Label Change Notice
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that requires notifying consumers within a defined notice period before changes to contractual terms or service functionality
Parent dpv:Notice
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#ReaffirmConsent
Label Reaffirm Consent
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that requires consumers to reaffirm their consent when contractual terms or services are modified
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#RightToTerminateAfterChange
Label Right to Terminate After Change
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition Control that ensures consumers can terminate the contract when they do not accept new contractual terms
IRI https://w3id.org/tosl/risk#TerminationNotice
Label Termination Notice
Type dpv:RiskMitigationMeasure
Definition CControl that requires notifying consumers within a defined notice period before terminating the service
Parent dpv:Notice
Source Annex UCTD. 1(g)

Conformance

Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example” or are set apart from the normative text with class="example", like this:

This is an example of an informative example.

Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the normative text with class="note", like this:

Note, this is an informative note.

References

Normative References

[RFC2119]
S. Bradner. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119